Appeal 2007-2807 Reexamination 90/006,511 Patent 5,156,811 shown in Figure 4, the flow control device of the invention will be covered with the accumulated liquid, as a result of which it will become substantially impervious to the flow of gas or liquid through it. This therefore terminates the aspiration before the accumulated liquid reaches the level at which undesired outflow from the outlet fitting can occur. Such a shut-off valve for controlling fluid flow is reasonably pertinent to the problem with which the patentee was involved. In the Background of the Invention section of the patentee’s specification, the problems with which the inventor was concerned were described. Specifically, they all involve contamination, during use, of pipette devices for drawing and dispensing liquid samples. A major problem is potential contamination by way of vaporized aerosol droplets and is described as follows (Spec. col. 1:33-42): One major problem with such liquid sampling arrangements is that the pipettor or suction device itself may become contaminated by a liquid sample, resulting in potential hazards to operators as well as cross-over contamination in subsequently drawn samples. One major cause of such contamination is the so called aerosol effect, in which some of the liquid sample is vaporized and forms droplets which are drawn upwardly with the air as it is drawn out of the pipette by the suction device. A separate problem is contamination by contact with the liquid sample itself and is described as follows (Spec. col. 1:42-47): Such contamination can also occur if the operator holds the pipette wrongly while drawing or transporting the sample, for example at an angle rather than vertically, if the pipette is jarred or moved too quickly, so that the liquid flows to the pipettor end of the tube, or if the liquid foams or bubbles up the tube. 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013