This opinion is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE LLC
____________
Appeal 2007-2906
Application 10/295,315
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: 8 August 2007
____________
Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, and
RICHARD TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
The claims on appeal relate broadly to rigid foams for insulation. The
examiner has rejected claims 1-8, all of the pending claims, under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103. The appellant (Bayer) seeks review of the rejection. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The claims
Bayer has opted not to delineate separate groups of claims for separate
treatment in its arguments as provided by rule. Hence, we treat the claims as
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013