Ex Parte Casile et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                           
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                            Ex parte OLIVIER CASILE and JOAQUIN PICON                                         
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-2978                                                 
                                           Application 10/744,130                                             
                                          Technology Center 3600                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                       Decided:  September 27. 2007                                           
                                               ____________                                                   
            Before TERRY J. OWENS, HUBERT C. LORIN, and JENNIFER D. BAHR,                                     
            Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                     
            LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   

                                       STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                   This is an appeal from a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-9.                    
            35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002).  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6 (b) (2002).                     
                   The invention is directed to transferring catalogs over the Internet.                      






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013