The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte OLIVIER CASILE and JOAQUIN PICON ____________ Appeal 2007-2978 Application 10/744,130 Technology Center 3600 ____________ Decided: September 27. 2007 ____________ Before TERRY J. OWENS, HUBERT C. LORIN, and JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE This is an appeal from a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-9. 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6 (b) (2002). The invention is directed to transferring catalogs over the Internet.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013