Appeal 2007-3197
Application 10/817,131
As for the § 103 rejection, we note that Appellant bases no argument
upon objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected results.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well stated by
the Examiner, the Examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(vi).
AFFIRMED
cam
ADMIN, TUROCY & CALVIN, LLP
1900 EAST 9TH STREET, NATIONAL CITY CENTER
24TH FLOOR
CLEVELAND, OH 44144
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013