The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte CAITLYN CURTIN
______________
Appeal No. 2007-3253
Application 10/733,414
Technology Center 3700
_______________
Decided: September 27, 2007
_______________
Before CHARLES F. WARREN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicant appeals to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 14 in the Office Action mailed
June 20, 2005. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a)
(2005).
We reverse the decision of the Primary Examiner.
Claim 1 illustrates Appellant’s invention of a dryer, and is
representative of the claims on appeal:
1. A dryer comprising:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013