Appeal 2007-3256
Application 10/900,619
ORDER
The rejection of claims 1 and 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
anticipated by JP ‘976 is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 1-14 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated
by Munro is affirmed.
The provisional rejection of claims 1-14 under the judicially created
doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as unpatentable over claims
1-7, 26-32, 35-36, 38 and 45-51 of copending Application No. 10/034,825 is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(i)(iv).
AFFIRMED
clj
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT
ONE PPG PLACE
PITTSBURGH, PA 15272
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013