The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DONG TIAN, RALPH W. WRIGHT, JR., and SCOTT WHALEN ____________ Appeal 2007-3374 Application 10/448,758 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: September 28, 2007 ____________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's refusal to allow claims 1 through 23. Claims 24 through 45, the other claims pending in the above-identified application, stand withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013