Appeal 2007-3386
Application 10/375,889
claim 1 as a resin component in the ink of Fukushima based on the
combined teachings of Fukushima and Ohta.
It follows that we shall affirm both of the Examiner’s obviousness
rejections, on this record.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1, 3-8, and 11 under
35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph as lacking written descriptive support in the
Specification, as filed; to reject claims 1, 3-5, 7, 8, and 11 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Fukushima in view of Ohta; and to
reject claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Fukushima in view of Ohta and Mead is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2007).
AFFIRMED
tf/ls
Rohm and Haas Company
Patent Department
100 Independence Mall West
Philadelphia, PA 19106-2399
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013