The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN C. COLVIN,
CHARLES VIGNAL,
PHILIPPE EDOUARD TISSOT, and
LARRY RAYMOND CROWE
____________
Appeal 2007-3388
Application 11/095,901
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 31, 2007
____________
Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Statement of the Case
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection
of claims 1-4, 15-22, and 33-48. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013