Appeal 2007-3388
Application 11/095,901
steps used by Diehr, i.e., the use of a preformed lignocellulosic
material (Diehr’s end product) in the production of the claimed
article. The Examiner has not adequately explained why the product
of Diehr reasonably appears to be the same as the claimed invention.
Accordingly, we reverse the Examiner's rejections of claims 1-4, 15-
22, and 33-48.
ORDER
The Examiner's decision rejecting claims 1-4, 15-22, and 33-
48 is reversed.
REVERSED
sld/LS
WONG, CABELLO, LUTSCH, RUTHERFORD
& BRUCCULERI, L.L.P.
20333 SH 249
SUITE 600
HOUSTON, TX 77070
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4
Last modified: September 9, 2013