Ex Parte Dantz et al - Page 1



                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                          
                                     not binding precedent of the Board.                                       

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                               ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                    
                           Ex parte DIRK DANTZ, WILFRIED VON AMMON,                                            
                                   DIRK ZEMKE, and FRANZ SEGIETH                                               
                                               ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-3417                                                 
                                           Application 10/351,739                                              
                                          Technology Center 1700                                               
                                               ____________                                                    
                                          Decided: August 27, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                    

                Before CHUNG K. PAK, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and                                                    
                JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s                           
                decision rejecting claims 1, 3, and 8.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                   
                § 6(b).                                                                                        
                      We AFFIRM.                                                                               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013