The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DIRK DANTZ, WILFRIED VON AMMON, DIRK ZEMKE, and FRANZ SEGIETH ____________ Appeal 2007-3417 Application 10/351,739 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: August 27, 2007 ____________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 3, and 8. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013