The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ELISE TOMSIK EDELMAN,
MARY ELLEN RALEIGH, SUSAN TYLER EDE,
MARTY ALLEN VANDERSTELT,
THOMAS JACKSON KIRK,
and GAYLE MARIE FRANKENBACH
____________
Appeal 2007-3545
Application 11/197,039
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 19, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 the final rejection of claims
1-18. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013