The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LAURA KIEFER-LIPTAK,
JOHN M. DUDIK,
RONALD R. AMBROSE,
KEVIN C. OLSON and
PADMANABHAN SUNDARARAMAN
____________
Appeal 2007-3547
Application 10/231,652
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 22, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, PETER F. KRATZ, and CATHERINE Q.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection
of claims 7, 8, 15-22, 36-48, 50, and 51. We have jurisdiction pursuant to
35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013