The opinion in support of the decision being entered is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TODD A. BLATCHFORD, STEVEN B. HEINECKE, DONALD H. LUCAST, and DONALD G. PETERSON ____________ Appeal 2007-3575 Application 10/233,698 Technology Center 1600 ____________ Decided: August 27, 2007 ____________ Before DONALD E. ADAMS, LORA M. GREEN and RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges. GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 65-83. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). Claims 65, 66, 77, and 78 are representative of the claims on appeal, and read as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013