The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JASON A. SHOLDER
____________
Appeal 2007-3787
Reexamination 90/006,6421
Patent 4,944,298
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: September 27, 2007
____________
Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, JAMESON LEE, and SALLY C.
MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
1 DECISION ON APPEAL
2 A. Statement of the Case
3
4 This is a decision on appeal by an Applicant under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) and
5 35 U.S.C. § 306 from a rejection of claims 6, 14, 17, 21/6, 22/6, 23/6, 24,
6 25, 26, 27/17, and 28/17 in Reexamination 90/006,642 of Patent 4,944,298.
7 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).2
1 The patent under reexamination is based on Application 07/355,588,
filed May 23, 1989. The real party in interest is Pacesetter, Inc.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013