Appeal 2007-3787 Reexamination 90/006,642 Patent 4,944,298 1 Reference Relied on by the Examiner 2 Nappholz US 4,429,687 Feb. 7, 1984 3 Sholder US 4,856,523 Aug. 15, 1989 4 Berkovits US 4,932,406 Jun. 12, 1990 5 Neal E. Fearnot, “A Review of Pacemakers That Physiologically Increase 6 Rate: The DDD and Rate-Responsive Pacemakers,” Progress in 7 Cardiovascular Diseases, Vol. XXIX, No. 2 145-164 (1986). 8 9 The Rejections on Appeal 10 11 The Examiner rejected claims 23 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first 12 paragraph, as without written description in the specification. 13 The Examiner rejected claims 6, 14, and 17, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as 14 unpatentable over Fearnot, and Berkovits or Sholder. 15 The Examiner rejected claims 6, 14, and 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as 16 unpatentable over Fearnot. 17 The Examiner rejected claims 6, 14, 17, 21/6, 22/6, 23/6, 24-26, 18 27/17, and 28/17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Nappholz, and 19 Berkovits or Sholder. 20 B. Issue 21 Has the Applicant shown error in the rejection of claims 6, 14, 17, 22 21/6, 22/6, 23/6, 24, 25, 26, 27/17, and 28/17? 23 C. Summary of the Decision 24 No error has been shown in the rejection of claims 6, 14, 17, 21/6, 25 22/6, 23/6, 24, 25, 26, 27/17, and 28/17. 2 The “/” symbol designates the particular claim dependency in a multiple dependent claim. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013