The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte MANDY B. SCHWEITZER,
STEVEN G. HALTERBAUM,
RAYMOND C. SWANN,
RALPH MICHAEL FAY, and
CHRISTOPHER JAMES GRIFFIN
____________________
Appeal 2007-3794
Application 10/850,5171
Technology Center 1700
____________________
Decided: August 23, 2007
____________________
Before CAROL A. SPIEGEL, MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, and MARK
NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
I. Introduction
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's final rejections of claims 1-10 as obvious under 35 U.S.C.
1 Application 10/850,517 was filed 20 May 2004. The real party-in-interest
is said to be Johns Manville (Substitute Brief ("Sub. Br."), filed 21
September 2006, p. 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013