Appeal No. 2007-3827
Application 08/713,905
Appellants’ countervailing evidence of and argument for nonobviousness
and conclude that the claimed invention encompassed by appealed claims 1
and 2 would have been obvious as a matter of law under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
The Primary Examiner’s decision is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2007).
AFFIRMED
sld/ls
PATENT DEPARTMENT
BAYER CORPORATION
100 BAYER ROAD
PITTSBURGH, PA 15205-9741
24
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Last modified: September 9, 2013