The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte MASAHIKO NAKAYAMA
__________________
Appeal 2007-3837
Application 10/631,8971
Technology Center 2100
________________
Decided: September 26, 2007
________________
Before JAMESON LEE, SALLY C. MEDLEY, and JAMES T. MOORE,
Administrative Patent Judges.
MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 A. Statement of the Case
2 Applicant’s appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
3 claim 5. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
4 The prior art relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the claims on
5 appeal is:
1 Application for patent filed 1 August 2003. The real party in interest is
NEC Corporation (Br. 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013