Appeal 2007-3837
Application 10/631,897
1 the gating elements provide either signals in the parallel lines (when
2 enabled) or otherwise zero (when disabled) to the adder 502 in response to
3 control signals CO and C1 (FFs 4 and 9). Applicant’s argument is
4 insufficient to demonstrate error in the Examiner’s specific findings.
5 For all of these reasons, the Examiner’s rejection of claim 5 is
6 sustained.
7 E. Decision
8 Upon consideration of the record, and for the reasons given, the
9 Examiner’s rejection is affirmed.
10 The Examiner’s rejection of claims 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
11 being anticipated by Christopher is affirmed.
12 No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
13 this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) 2006.
14
AFFIRMED
hlj
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1177 Avenue of Americas
New York, NY 10036-2714
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013