The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte JUDITH M. VANDEWINCKEL, VINCENZO G. MARCELLO, GRAYZNA E. KMIECIK-LAWRYNOWICZ, TIE HWEE NG, and CHIEH-MIN CHENG ______________ Appeal 2007-4185 Application 10/743,097 Technology Center 1700 _______________ Decided: September 26, 2007 _______________ Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 19 in the Office Action mailed March 31, 2006. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2006). We AFFIRM the decision of the Primary Examiner.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013