The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte ROSWELL J. RUKA, GEORGE R. FOLSER, and SRIKANTH GOPALAN ______________ Appeal 2007-4240 Application 10/663,949 Technology Center 1700 _______________ Decided: October 31, 2007 _______________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting for at least the second time claims 1 through 18 in the Office Action mailed August 25, 2006. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2006). We reverse the decision of the Primary Examiner.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013