Appeal 2007-4240
Application 10/663,949
or yttria. The Examiner does not establish that Cable’s thus described
porous body anode fuel electrode has a metal-ceramic microstructure
characterized by accumulated molten particle splats formed on at least a
portion of the electrolyte as claimed.
Accordingly, the Examiner has not established a prima facie case of
anticipation or of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(b) and 103(a) in the
grounds of rejection applying Ramanarayanan, and of obviousness under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in the ground of rejection over Cable alone, and
accordingly, we reverse the grounds of rejection of claims 1 through 18.
The Primary Examiner’s decision is reversed.
REVERSED
tf
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013