This opinion is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte AIRBUS FRANCE
____________
Appeal 2007-4307
Application 10/173,095
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 28, 2007
____________
Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, RICHARD TORCZON, and
MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
The claims on appeal relate to a process for making a reinforced
acoustically resistive layer. The examiner has rejected all pending claims.
The appellant (Airbus) seeks review. We affirm.
THE CLAIMS
Claims 18-38 are pending. Airbus has not argued the patentability of
the claims separately so for the contested rejections we treat the claims as
standing or falling together based on representative claim 18.1 Although
1 37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013