- 10 -
By notice served January 5, 1994, this case was set for
trial in Hartford, Connecticut, on June 6, 1994. On April 8,
1994, petitioner filed a Motion for Continuance. Petitioner
represented that he was in the process of seeking to set aside a
guilty verdict entered against him in the mail fraud case and
that, therefore, he could not prepare for trial of this case.
On April 18, 1994, respondent filed a Motion to Compel
Production of Documents, and, on April 25, 1994, respondent filed
a Motion to Compel Responses to Respondent's Interrogatories.
Respondent's Motion to Compel Production of Documents was
granted, and petitioner was ordered to produce the documents on
or before May 6, 1994. Respondent's motion with respect to
interrogatories was granted, and petitioner was ordered to
respond to the interrogatories on or before May 16, 1994. The
motions were set for hearing with respect to sanctions on June 6,
1994.
Meanwhile, on April 28, 1994, Ms. Barth filed a Motion to
Consolidate this case with her case. That motion was granted
May 3, 1994. In a subsequent telephone conference call among the
parties and the Court, the Court indicated that petitioner's
Motion for Continuance would be granted only if he cooperated
with respondent with respect to the stipulation of facts and
responded to the outstanding discovery. Thereafter, Ms. Barth
moved for a severance of the cases, representing that her
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011