- 14 - record. Rowlee v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. 1111, 1123 (1983); Hicks Co. v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 982, 1019 (1971), affd. 470 F.2d 87 (1st Cir. 1972). Fraudulent intent may be inferred from circumstantial evidence, such as proof of conduct the likely effect of which is to mislead or conceal. Spies v. United States, 317 U.S. 492, 499-500 (1943); Foster v. Commissioner, 391 F.2d 727, 733 (4th Cir. 1968), affg. in part, revg. and remanding in part T.C. Memo. 1965-246; Stephenson v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. at 1006. Courts frequently list various factors or "badges of fraud" from which fraudulent intent may be inferred. Although such lists are nonexclusive, some of the factors this Court has considered indicative of fraud are (1) understatement of income, (2) inadequate records, (3) failure to file tax returns, (4) implausible or inconsistent explanations of behavior, (5) concealment of assets, (6) failure to cooperate with the tax authorities, (7) filing false Forms W-4, (8) failure to make estimated tax payments, (9) dealing in cash, (10) engaging in illegal activity, and (11) attempting to conceal illegal activity. Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 211 (1992) (citing Bradford v. Commissioner, 796 F.2d 303, 307-308 (9th Cir. 1986), affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-601). Petitioner has understated his income. Although petitioner presented Caplan with a list of some of the missing cars during the inventory, he has not presented any evidence to show he keptPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011