Carl Dimichele and Eileen Dimichele - Page 38

                  During the years at issue, petitioner had $4,000                    
             deposited into her IRA account.                                          
                  Petitioner withdrew large sums from the Home Unity                  
             bank account.  This money came from insurance proceeds                   
             received after petitioners' house was damaged by fire that               
             had been deposited directly in the Home Unity account.                   
             Renovations must have been accomplished with other money                 
             since the insurance money remained in the bank while                     
             renovations were performed on the house.  Petitioner did                 
             not show us any alternative source of funds for these                    
             renovations.  We therefore infer that such funds were                    
             traceable to the understatements or the items underlying                 
             the understatements.  [R's brief, p. 52]                                 
                  Petitioner maintained six other bank accounts either                
             jointly with Mr. DiMichele or individually.  Petitioner has              
             made no showing as to the source of the funds in these                   
             accounts.                                                                
                  During the years at issue, payments of $367.31 were                 
             made or the debt was retired in some way on a Cadillac                   
             purchased by the DiMicheles in 1983.  The purchase of the                
             Cadillac and the use of the vehicle constitutes a benefit                
             to petitioner.                                                           
                  Petitioner testified that when Mr. DiMichele began his              
             prison term, he gave petitioner approximately $40,000 to                 
             live on while he was incarcerated.  Petitioner claims this               
             constituted normal support.  In Estate of Krock, a wife                  
             claiming innocent spouse relief was deemed to have                       
             benefitted beyond normal support by carrying out a unique                
             and unusual lifestyle.  The wife had joined her husband who              
             fled to the Bahamas as a fugitive from justice.  She                     
             claimed that since life in exile was a source of                         
             unhappiness, any benefit received during this period should              
             not be considered anything above normal support.  In                     
             rejecting this argument, the Court observed that her                     
             ability to maintain life abroad with her husband who was                 
             avoiding arrest and trial could not be described as "normal              
             support."   Estate of Krock, supra at 684.  Similarly,                   
             petitioner's receipt of a large amount of cash to live on                
             while her husband was in jail constitutes an unusual                     










Page:  Previous  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011