- 47 - aside money into passbook savings accounts, Government savings bonds, CD's, and retirement plans for themselves and their children. Mrs. Quinn has assisted her children financially when needed, the largest sum at any one time being $3,000 to help her younger daughter purchase a house. Nothing in the record indicates an increase in spending or a large increase in assets during or after the years at issue. Based on these facts, we hold that Mrs. Quinn did not know and had no reason to know of any understatements of income on the Quinns' Federal income tax returns for the taxable years 1979, 1980, or 1981. Ineguity of Holding Mrs. Quinn Liable Mrs. Quinn contends that it would be inequitable to hold her liable for the tax deficiency arising from the understatements because she has not benefited from the omitted income. Respondent's position is that it would not be inequitable, since Mrs. Quinn has not proved she did not benefit. Nothing suggests a significant benefit accrued to Mrs. Quinn as a result of the understatement of Mr. Quinn's income. Mrs. Quinn continued her usual frugal spending and savings habits. See Dakil v. United States, 496 F.2d 431 (10th Cir. 1974). The large volume of financial documents submitted by Mrs. Quinn fails to indicate any large or unusual amounts being deposited into her accounts, or into those she previously heldPage: Previous 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011