- 49 - their two daughters. Remaining in the marriage, however, does not preclude Mrs. Quinn from relief. Should liability be imposed on Mrs. Quinn, the debt would be paid from her assets, primarily her retirement funds and the house given to her by her parents. This would be inequitable since she did not benefit from Mr. Quinn's omitted income. Given all the facts and circumstances, we conclude that it would be inequitable to hold Mrs. Quinn liable for the deficiencies in tax arising from Mr. Quinn's understated income for the taxable years 1979, 1980, and 1981. We hold that both Mrs. Gaskins and Mrs. Quinn are entitled to innocent spouse relief under section 6013(e). Based on the concessions and the above holdings, Decisions will be entered for petitioners Elaine Gaskins and Sabina A. Ouinn on the innocent spouse issue for 1979, 1980, and 1981. Decisions will be entered for respondent on the deficiencies in tax for 1979, 1980, and 1981, and the addition to tax for fraud for 1979 and 1980 as to petitioners William C. Gaskins and Pasquale T. Quinn.Page: Previous 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
Last modified: May 25, 2011