Chan Q. Kieu and Quynh Kieu - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         

          a separate adversary action against petitioners requesting that the bankruptcy
          court determine that petitioners' debts were nondischargeable pursuant to 11
          U.S.C. section 727(a) (1988).3  After filing the above-described complaints,
          Pacific and the bankruptcy trustee filed separate motions for summary judgment
          with the bankruptcy court. These matters were consolidated under the docket 
          number for Pacific's action, and all pleadings were filed under that action.
          On March 14, 1994, respondent mailed a notice of deficiency to              
          petitioners determining a deficiency in their Federal income tax for 1989 in
          the amount of $78,978 along with an accuracy-related penalty pursuant to    
          section 6662(a) in the amount of $15,796.                                   
               On November 1, 1994, the bankruptcy court entered an order granting    
          Pacific's motion for summary judgment.  The bankruptcy court's order states in
          pertinent part:                                                             


                         (2) for money, property, services, or an    extension,       
                    renewal, or refinancing of credit, to        the extent obtained  
                    by--                                                              
                              (A) false pretenses, a false representation, or actual  
                         fraud, other than a statement respecting the debtor's or an  
                         insider's financial condition;                               
                              (B) use of a statement in writing--                     
                                                                                     
                                   (i) that is materially false;                      
                                   (ii) respecting the debtor's or an insider's       
                              financial condition;                                    
                                   (iii) on which the creditor to whom the debtor     
                              is liable for such money, property, services, or        
                              credit reasonably relied; and                           
                                   (iv) that the debtor caused to be made or          
                              published with intent to deceive; * * *                 
          3  The bankruptcy trustee argued that the bankruptcy court should deny      
          petitioners a discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. sec. 727(a) (1988), which     
          provides in pertinent part that a debtor shall be granted a discharge unless
          the debtor is found to have transferred, removed, destroyed, mutilated, or  
          concealed property of the debtor or property of the estate with the intent to
          hinder, delay, or defraud a creditor or an officer of the estate charged with
          custody of property under the Bankruptcy Code.                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011