Chan Q. Kieu and Quynh Kieu - Page 8

                                                - 8 -                                                  

            effect and any action taken in the interim is in violation of the stay.                    
            Second, as petitioner contends, if the stay is lifted by a judgment described              
            in 11 U.S.C. section 362(c) (1988), and that order is vacated, the stay is                 
            automatically reimposed.  Third, as respondent contends, once the stay is                  
            lifted by an order described in 11 U.S.C. section 362(c) (1988), it is not                 
            automatically reimposed.  In discussing these alternatives, we begin with the              
            question whether the bankruptcy court's order entered November 1, 1994, had                
            the effect of terminating the automatic stay.                                              
                  As previously discussed, the automatic stay imposed under 11 U.S.C.                  
            section 362(a)(8) (1988), normally remains in effect until the earliest of the             
            closing of the case, dismissal of the case, or the grant or denial of a                    
            discharge.  11 U.S.C. sec. 362(c)(2) (1988).  Consistent with the plain                    
            language of 11 U.S.C. section 362(c)(2)(C) (1988), we agree with the parties               
            that the bankruptcy court's order entered November 1, 1994, wherein the                    
            bankruptcy court ruled that petitioners' debts were nondischargeable under 11              
            U.S.C. section 727 (1988), served to terminate the automatic stay of                       
            proceedings in this Court.5  See In re Calder, 973 F.2d 862, 867 (10th Cir.                
            1992); see also In re Trevino, 78 Bankr. 29, 37 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 1987).  Cf.               
            In re De Jesus Saez, 721 F.2d 848 (1st Cir. 1983) (automatic stay lifted by                
            dismissal of chapter 13 petition); Smith v. Commissioner, 96 T.C. 10 (1991)                
            (automatic stay terminated as the result of a waiver of discharge by the                   
            taxpayer/debtor); In re Weston, 110 Bankr. 452 (E.D. Cal. 1989) (automatic                 
            stay lifted by dismissal of chapter 11 petition), affd. without published                  
            opinion 967 F.2d 596 (9th Cir. 1992).                                                      
            Reinstating a Stay                                                                         

            5   There is no evidence in the record that the bankruptcy court intended                  
            for its Nov. 1, 1994, order to have any other effect or that petitioners                   
            sought a continuance of the automatic stay pending the filing of their motion              
            for relief.                                                                                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011