Leo N. Levitt and Ruth G. Levitt - Page 59

                                       - 59 -                                         
          for 1965, $241,895 for 1966, $98,213 for 1967, $221,132 for 1968,           
          $258,763 for 1969, and $17,945 for 1970.                                    
                    b.   Corporate Diversions for Personal Use                        
               A taxpayer's diversion of corporate funds to the taxpayer's            
          own use is evidence of fraud.  Solomon v. Commissioner, 732 F.2d            
          1459, 1460-1461 (6th Cir. 1984), affg. T.C. Memo. 1982-603;                 
          United States v. Brill, 270 F.2d 525, 527 (3d Cir. 1959).  As               
          discussed above, petitioner diverted a substantial amount of                
          funds from Resyn using Polymer and Chemical Traders as nominee              
          accounts.  He diverted to Chemical Traders $297,115.19 in 1964,             
          $248,435.81 in 1965, $526,815.33 in 1966, $253,767.62 in 1967,              
          $66,554.58 in 1968, $70,878.23 in 1969, and $15,600 in 1970.  He            
          diverted to Polymer $238,556 in 1964, $87,750.02 in 1966,                   
          $40,517.47 in 1968, $122,649.81 in 1969, and $5,370.72 in 1970.             
          After petitioner diverted funds to Polymer and Chemical Traders,            
          he withdrew cash from the Polymer and Chemical Traders accounts,            
          and used the Chemical Traders account to pay for his stock                  
          investments.  In addition to the amounts petitioner diverted to             
          himself through Polymer and Chemical Traders, Resyn paid                    
          substantial amounts for petitioners' personal expenses which                
          petitioners did not report.                                                 
                    c.   False or Inadequate Records                                  
               False entries in books and records and false purchase                  
          invoices are compelling evidence of fraud.  Marienfeld v. United            
          States, 214 F.2d 632, 634-635 (8th Cir. 1954); United States v.             




Page:  Previous  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011