Betty J. Shackelford - Page 24

                                         - 24 -                                       
          consultant.  While in Guatemala, petitioner and Mr. Maynard                 
          enrolled in the Professional Spanish Language School, which met for         
          6 hours a day, 5 days a week.  Petitioner enrolled for 2 weeks, and         
          Mr. Maynard enrolled for 4 weeks.  Petitioner returned from                 
          Guatemala on November 7, 1989, and Mr. Maynard returned on November         
          18, 1989.                                                                   
               When a taxpayer's travel takes her outside the United States,          
          section 274(c) requires an allocation of all expenses in addition           
          to the other substantiation requirements.  No deduction is allowed          
          for those expenses that are not allocable to the taxpayer's trade           
          or business.  Sec. 274(c)(1).  Such allocation is not required,             
          however, if the travel does not exceed 1 week, or the amount of             
          time allocated to nonbusiness activities is less than 25 percent of         
          the total travel time.  Sec. 274(c)(2).                                     
               Furthermore, when a taxpayer's spouse accompanies her on a             
          business trip, expenses attributable to his travel are not                  
          deductible unless the taxpayer adequately shows that the spouse's           
          presence on the trip has a bona fide business purpose other than            
          the performance of some incidental service.  Sec. 1.162-2(c),               
          Income Tax Regs.  The spouse must provide substantial services that         
          are directly and primarily related to the carrying on of the                
          taxpayer's business.  Weatherford v. United States, 418 F.2d 895,           
          897 (9th Cir. 1969).  The court in Weatherford disallowed a                 
          deduction for the traveling expenses of a wife who did not work on          
          her husband's wheat farm and who had no specific role in connection         




Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011