- 28 - of the MCA provided EGPC with a deduction from gross income for royalties and the Egyptian taxes that were paid on Amoco Egypt's behalf. Such understanding was based variously and cumulatively on the plain language of the English version of the MCA, the lack of knowledge that the Arabic was possibly different than the English, the internal symmetry of the MCA, and the August 4, 1975, letter of principles, supra p. 19. On September 5, 1979, Amoco submitted a request to the IRS for a ruling on the creditability of Amoco's Egyptian income taxes based on certain proposed changes to the MCA as follows: 1. Amendment of the MCA to delete all provisions relating to Amoco Egypt's income tax liability, including the provision under which EGPC assumes responsibility for paying Amoco Egypt's tax liability, and to state simply that Amoco Egypt is subject to Egyptian income tax laws and shall comply with those laws. 2. Addition of the Petroleum Production Incentive Allowance ("PPIA") to reflect the additional economic burden assumed by Amoco Egypt for its own tax liability. 3. Clarification that Amoco would become directly liable for payment of its income taxes from Amoco's funds. 4. Provision for the establishment of certain rules to clarify how the Egyptian income tax laws apply to the oil and gas business. Due to Leithy's refusal, the ruling request did not assume that EGPC would apply the modified tax provisions to non-U.S. oil companies. This provided an element of doubt to Amoco regarding U.S. creditability.Page: Previous 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011