Amoco Corporation (Formerly Standard Oil Company (Indiana) and Affiliated Corporations - Page 43

                                       - 43 -                                         
          February 6, 1992, meeting, Banbi told Work to let him know if               
          Amoco was not receiving full cooperation from EGPC.  Amoco                  
          contacted Shaarawy shortly after the February 6, 1992, meeting.             
          On February 10, 1992, Lenahan and Carlson met with EGPC's                   
          A. Radwan.  Lenahan and Carlson requested EGPC's help to show:              
          (1) That EGPC is part of the Egyptian Government, and (2) that              
          EGPC does not receive a subsidy from the Egyptian Government.  On           
          February 11, 1992, Lenahan and Carlson met with A. Radwan again             
          and provided him with an extensive report on the two issues.                
          EGPC expressed that it would fully cooperate.                               
               Amoco did not ask Minister Banbi to consider changing EGPC's           
          tax credit practice until May 13, 1992, after the determination             
          of the ETD, reflected in a letter dated May 2, 1992, that EGPC              
          was not entitled to claim credits for foreign partner taxes.                
          Until May 1992, EGPC had officially taken the position that it              
          was entitled to a tax credit.                                               
               In December 1989, Ahmed Ismail, a tax inspector in the                 
          Petroleum Section of the Department of Tax on Joint Stock                   
          Companies of the ETD, conducted his first audit of EGPC,                    
          concerning its 1983-1984 return.  He did not challenge EGPC's               
          claimed tax credits for royalties or foreign partner taxes.  Such           
          action conformed with the failure to challenge such credits in              
          earlier years.                                                              
               In an audit report signed November 29, 1990, concerning                
          EGPC's 1984-1985 tax year, Ismail reported that EGPC subtracted             




Page:  Previous  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011