Amoco Corporation (Formerly Standard Oil Company (Indiana) and Affiliated Corporations - Page 46

                                       - 46 -                                         
               In an Internal Committee report dated January 19, 1992,                
          concerning the 1980-1981 tax year, there is no discussion of                
          foreign partner taxes.  The final assessment for the 1980-1981              
          year, Forms 3 and 4, dated February 3, 1992, did not allow a                
          credit for royalties or taxes paid on behalf of foreign partners.           
          In another Form 19 concerning the 1980-1981 year, dated April 14,           
          1992, the ETD served a notice of tax assessment based on the                
          disallowance of a credit to EGPC.  This was not a "revised" Form            
          19.                                                                         
               EGPC objected to the disallowance of credits for the 1980-             
          1981 year.                                                                  
               In January 1992, Ismail prepared a memorandum for the head             
          of the Tax Department for Joint Stock Companies describing EGPC's           
          treatment of royalties and foreign partner taxes, concluding that           
          EGPC's treatment was improper.  Ismail discussed the issue with             
          his superiors in the department.  The issue was then referred to            
          the ETD's Research Department in February 1992.  Ismail                     
          subsequently met with personnel from the Research Department,               
          described the adjustments he had made, and provided them with               
          copies of EGPC's tax returns and the MCA.                                   
               In Ismail's discussions with the Research Department, only             
          the Arabic text of the MCA was considered.  The word "minha" in             
          Article IV(f)(6) was considered and, following Ismail's belief              
          that "minha" referred to the method of calculation, Ismail and              






Page:  Previous  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011