John W. and Mary Anne Antoine, Albert G. and Louise A. Churik, John R. and Susan E. Ross - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
                              Additions to Tax and Increased Interest                 
               Year Deficiency  Sec. 6653(a)(1)  Sec. 6653(a)(2)  Sec. 6659  Sec. 6621(c)
               1981 $5,207   $260.35            1      $1,529.40 2                    
               1982 4,148    207.40             1      948.60    2                    
               1 50% of the interest due on the deficiency.                           
               2 120% of the interest payable under sec. 6601.                        
          By notice of deficiency dated June 10, 1987, respondent                     
          determined deficiencies in, additions to, and increased interest            
          on petitioners John and Susan Ross' Federal income tax as                   
          follows:                                                                    
            Additions to Tax and Increased Interest                                   

               Year Deficiency  Sec. 6653(a)(1)  Sec. 6653(a)(2)  Sec. 6659  Sec. 6621(c)
               1981 $6,362   $318.10       1       $1,908.60  2                       
               1982 4,035    201.75        1       1,210.50   2                       
               1 50% of the interest due on the deficiency.                           
               2 120% of the interest payable under sec. 6601.                        
               In the stipulation, petitioners agreed to be bound by the              
          test case entitled Pinto v. Commissioner, docket No. 17407-86.              
          This Court entered a decision in the Pinto case on January 18,              
          1995.  The stipulation provides:                                            
                    With respect to all adjustments in respondent's                   
               notice of deficiency relating to the Scheer Project tax                
               shelter, more specifically, the limited partnership                    
               entitled Richard II, Ltd., the parties stipulate to the                
               following terms of settlement:                                         
                    1.  THE ABOVE ADJUSTMENTS ARE THE ONLY ISSUES IN                  
               THIS CASE WITH RESPECT TO ALL PARTIES;                                 
                    2.  The above adjustments, as specified in the                    
               preamble, shall be redetermined by application of the                  
               same formula as that which resolved the same tax                       
               shelter adjustments with respect to the following                      
               taxpayers:                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011