- 4 -
Names: Melvin and Barbara Pinto
Tax Court Docket No.: 17407-86
(hereafter the CONTROLLING CASE)
3. All issues involving the above adjustments
shall be resolved as if the petitioners in this case
were the same as the taxpayers in the CONTROLLING CASE;
* * *
5. A decision shall be submitted in this case
when the decision in the CONTROLLING CASE (whether
litigated or settled) becomes final under I.R.C. �
7481;
* * *
The parties agree to this STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT.
Respondent filed a motion for entry of decision with this
Court on October 30, 1995. Attached as an exhibit to said motion
was a decision document (the Document) which respondent claims to
be in accordance with the stipulation. By Order dated November
7, 1995, the Court directed petitioners to show cause why
respondent's above-referenced motion should not be granted.
Petitioners filed their response on January 16, 1996. They
contend that respondent's determinations involve incorrect
calculations and suggest that corrections are necessary before a
decision can be entered in this case. More specifically,
petitioners John and Mary Anne Antoine maintain that their notice
of deficiency does not reflect income-averaging and fails to
account properly for a sales tax deduction.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011