Bryan J. and Christine N. Baugh - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
               1991           7,372          ---            1,474                     
               1992           9,118          ---            1,824                     
          Respondent, in an amended answer pursuant to section 6214(a),               
          asserted increased deficiencies in tax and penalties as follows:            
          Increase in                                                                 
                              Increase in          Penalties                          
               Year           Deficiency          Sec. 6662(a)                        
               1990           $991                $198                                
               1991           143                      29                             
          Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the               
          Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all             
          Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and                  
          Procedure.                                                                  
               On brief, petitioners conceded the following:  (1) The                 
          deficiency and addition to tax for 1988 as determined by                    
          respondent, (2) the portion of the deficiency that represents the           
          per diem payments received between June and December 1992 from              
          petitioners’ employers, and (3) the increased deficiencies                  
          asserted for 1990 and 1991 in respondent’s amended answer.  After           
          these concessions, the issues remaining for decision are:                   
          (1) Whether the per diem payments petitioners received during               
          1990, 1991, and a portion of 1992 constitute taxable income;                
          (2) if the per diem amounts are taxable income, whether                     
          petitioners are entitled to deduct an allowance for travel                  
          expenses incurred while away from Port Clinton, Ohio; and                   
          (3) whether petitioners are liable for the accuracy-related                 
          penalty for negligence or disregard of rules or regulations for             
          1990, 1991, and 1992.                                                       



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011