Bryan J. and Christine N. Baugh - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          Regs., and cannot exclude the per diem/travel amounts from their            
          gross income.                                                               
          Deductibility of Per Diem/Travel Amounts                                    
               On brief, petitioners focused on the deductibility of the              
          per diem/travel amounts as ordinary and necessary travel expenses           
          under section 162(a)(2).  Section 162(a)(2) provides:                       
                    (a) In general.--There shall be allowed as a                      
               deduction all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid                 
               or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any                 
               trade or business, including--                                         
                         *    *    *    *    *    *    *                              
                         (2) traveling expense (including amounts                     
                    expended for meals and lodging other than amounts                 
                    which are lavish or extravagant under the                         
                    circumstances) while away from home in the pursuit                
                    of a trade or business * * *                                      
          Therefore, for a traveling expense to be deductible, three                  
          requirements must be satisfied:  (1) The expense must be                    
          reasonable and necessary; (2) the expense must be incurred while            
          away from home; and (3) the expense must be incurred in the                 
          pursuit of business.  Commissioner v. Flowers, 326 U.S. 465                 
          (1946); Brandl v. Commissioner, 513 F.2d 697 (6th Cir. 1975),               
          affg. T.C. Memo. 1974-160.                                                  
               Petitioners bear the burden of proving that they are                   
          entitled to any claimed deduction.  Rule 142(a); INDOPCO, Inc. v.           
          Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992).  This burden includes                 
          substantiating the amount of the item claimed.  Hradesky v.                 
          Commissioner, 65 T.C. 87, 90 (1975), affd. per curiam 540 F.2d              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011