Allan J. and Brenda Becker - Page 42

                                       - 42 -                                         
          burden of proof with respect to the increased addition to tax.              
          Rule 142(a); Bagby v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. at 612.                        
               A graduated addition to tax is imposed when an individual              
          has an underpayment of tax that equals or exceeds $1,000 and "is            
          attributable to" a valuation overstatement.  Sec. 6659(a), (d).             
          A valuation overstatement exists if the fair market value (or               
          adjusted basis) of property claimed on a return equals or exceeds           
          150 percent of the amount determined to be the correct amount.              
          Sec. 6659(c).  If the claimed valuation exceeds 250 percent of              
          the correct value, the addition is equal to 30 percent of the               
          underpayment.  Sec. 6659(b).                                                
               Petitioner claimed tax benefits, including an investment tax           
          credit and a business energy credit, based on purported values of           
          $1,162,666 for each Sentinel EPE recycler.  Petitioner concedes             
          that the fair market value of a Sentinel EPE recycler in 1981 was           
          not in excess of $50,000.  Therefore, if disallowance of                    
          petitioner's claimed tax benefits is attributable to such                   
          valuation overstatements, petitioner is liable for the section              
          6659 additions to tax at the rate of 30 percent of the portions             
          of his underpayments attributable to such valuation                         
          overstatements.                                                             
               Petitioner contends that section 6659 does not apply in this           
          case because the deductions and credits he claimed were                     
          purportedly disallowed on grounds other than a valuation                    
          overstatement.  Petitioner relies on Gainer v. Commissioner, 893            




Page:  Previous  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011