Allan J. and Brenda Becker - Page 43

                                       - 43 -                                         
          F.2d 225 (9th Cir. 1990), affg. T.C. Memo. 1988-416; Todd v.                
          Commissioner, 89 T.C. 912 (1987), affd. 862 F.2d 540 (5th Cir.              
          1988), in support of this argument.                                         
               Section 6659 does not apply to underpayments of tax that are           
          not "attributable to" valuation overstatements.  See McCrary v.             
          Commissioner, 92 T.C. 827 (1989); Todd v. Commissioner, supra.              
          To the extent taxpayers claim tax benefits that are disallowed on           
          grounds separate and independent from alleged valuation                     
          overstatements, the resulting underpayments of tax are not                  
          regarded as attributable to valuation overstatements.  Krause v.            
          Commissioner, 99 T.C. 132, 178 (1992) (citing Todd v.                       
          Commissioner, supra), affd. sub nom. Hildebrand v. Commissioner,            
          28 F.3d 1024 (10th Cir. 1994).  However, when valuation is an               
          integral factor in disallowing deductions and credits, section              
          6659 is applicable.  See Illes v. Commissioner, 982 F.2d 163, 167           
          (6th Cir. 1992), affg. T.C. Memo. 1991-449; Gilman v.                       
          Commissioner, 933 F.2d 143, 151 (2d Cir. 1991) (section 6659                
          addition to tax applies if a finding of lack of economic                    
          substance is "due in part" to a valuation overstatement), affg.             
          T.C. Memo. 1989-684; Masters v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-              
          197, affd. without published opinion 70 F.3d 1262 (4th Cir.                 
          1995); Harness v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1991-321.                        
               Petitioner has not shown that disallowance of his claimed              
          tax benefits was due to anything other than a valuation                     
          overstatement.  In each of the notices of deficiency for 1981 and           




Page:  Previous  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011