Elaine S. Bennett - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         

          the Transfer Refund constitutes a "retirement distribution"                 
          within the meaning of section 4980A(e)(1)(A).  Cf. sec.                     
          4980A(c)(2)(C).                                                             
               In view of the foregoing, it necessarily follows that the              
          taxable portion of the Transfer Refund that exceeds $150,000;               
          i.e., $327,655.59 less $150,000, or $177,655.59, constitutes an             
          "excess distribution" within the meaning of section                         
          4980A(c)(1)(A).  Accordingly, petitioner is liable for the 15-              
          percent excise tax on excess distributions under section                    
          4980A(a).  See Emmons v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-265;                 
          Powell v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-264; Montgomery v.                  
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-263; see also O'Connor v.                     
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-170 (regarding section 4974).                 
               B.  Petitioner's Contention                                            
               Notwithstanding the foregoing, petitioner argues that she is           
          not liable for the excise tax under section 4980A(a) because the            
          Transfer Refund was not paid to her on account of her retirement            
          but rather as an inducement for her to transfer from the                    
          Retirement System to the Pension System.  In this regard,                   
          petitioner relies heavily on the fact that she remained an active           
          employee of the State of Maryland at the time that she received             
          the Transfer Refund and continuously thereafter.  Thus, in                  
          petitioner's view, the Transfer Refund did not constitute a                 
          retirement distribution because "petitioner has not retired from            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011