Thomas E. and Joan A. Bennett - Page 21

                                       - 21 -                                         
          only a review of the tax opinion letter.  He explained that he              
          relied upon the people at Ingersoll-Rand to make their own                  
          judgments of the value of the machines involved in the Empire               
          transaction since many of them were engineers and many had their            
          own resources to ascertain the value of machinery.  Gallagher               
          testified that the taxpayers he advised at Ingersoll-Rand                   
          concerning the Empire transaction "absolutely" understood that              
          they were not to rely upon him as to the value of the machinery.            
          While he purportedly read the offering memorandum, Gallagher                
          could not recall at trial how the Empire transaction was                    
          structured, how Empire was to receive income, or how much its               
          monthly lease payments were.  Gallagher could not even recall the           
          name of the purported end-user of the recycler in which he                  
          personally had invested.                                                    
               Gallagher spoke with Taggart and Roberts, but the record               
          does not indicate what representations they may have made to him            
          or if he learned anything beyond the representations in the                 
          offering memorandum.  Gallagher visited PI at the behest of                 
          Bennett.  His observations were those of a layman, and he was               
          careful to caution that he was not an engineer.  As Bennett put             
          it, Gallagher "could not assess the [Sentinel EPE recycler]                 
          machine in terms of its technical capability," but he could                 
          verify the existence of the machines.                                       
               In our view, petitioners' reliance on Gallagher was not                
          reasonable.  It was petitioners' reliance upon the purported                




Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011