Donald L. Chiappetti and Mary K. Chiappetti - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         

          in his individual capacity, Donald C. Chiappetti signed a promis-           
          sory note for $124,000 payable to CPC (promissory note).  Donald            
          C. Chiappetti paid all amounts due under that promissory note.              
               Petitioner, who was then 55 years old, retired from the                
          practice of dentistry upon execution by him, of (1) the purchase            
          contract in his capacity as president of CPC and (2) the covenant           
          not to compete in his individual capacity.                                  
               In its Federal income tax returns (returns) for 1990 and               
          1991, CPC reported income of $14,522 and $38,248, respectively,             
          attributable to the covenant not to compete.  CPC's income for              
          both 1990 and 1991 was offset by deductions CPC took in its                 
          respective returns for those years, including net operating loss            
          carryforwards.  As a result, CPC had no income tax liability for            
          1990 or 1991.                                                               
                                       OPINION                                        
               Petitioners bear the burden of proving that respondent's               
          determinations in the notice of deficiency (notice) are errone-             
          ous.  Rule 142(a);2 Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).           
          Petitioners attempted to satisfy their burden through testimonial           
          and documentary evidence.3                                                  

          2  All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and           
          Procedure.                                                                  
          3  At trial, we conditionally admitted into evidence certain                
          stipulated exhibits to which respondent objected on grounds of              
          relevance (viz., Exhibits 8, 10, and 11).  Although we shall                
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011