The Board of Trade of the City of Chicago and Subsidiaries - Page 1

                                                                                     










                                   106 T.C. No. 21                                    


                               UNITED STATES TAX COURT                                


               THE BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO AND SUBSIDIARIES,            
                                   Petitioner v.                                      
                    COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent                      


               Docket No. 8202-93.                      Filed May 29, 1996.           


                    Petitioner (P) is a taxable membership corporation                
               that operates a futures exchange.  When a membership on                
               the exchange is transferred, the transferee must pay P                 
               a transfer fee, which, under P’s bylaws, is to be used                 
               to “purchase, retire or redeem the indebtedness                        
               encumbering the Board of Trade Building”, which houses                 
               P’s trading floor and substantial office space leased                  
               to third-party tenants.  Held, the transfer fees are                   
               nontaxable contributions to capital, rather than                       
               taxable payments for services, because the transferees                 
               pay the fees with an investment motive, as evidenced by                
               (1) the earmarking of the fees for reduction of P’s                    
               mortgage indebtedness, (2) the resulting increase in                   
               the members’ equity in P, and (3) the members’                         
               opportunity to profit from their investment in P                       
               because of the lack of restrictions on the                             
               transferability of their membership interests.                         






Page:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011