Estate of Joseph Cidulka, Deceased, James S. Bozik, Administrator - Page 35

                                       - 35 -                                         
          share value in the distribution of the receipts from the sale as            
          the majority shares.  In fact, Mr. Ruppert testified in this                
          regard.  A marketability discount generally recognizes the                  
          difficulty in disposing of stock in a closely held corporation,             
          and a minority interest discount is applied because of the lack             
          of control of a corporation by a minority shareholder.  A                   
          minority shareholder could not control the selling of the assets            
          of the company in order to obtain the value from his stock.                 
          Since sales of outdoor advertising companies are generally asset            
          sales by such a business, minority stock interests likely would             
          be at a discount.  See Estate of Hall v. Commissioner, 92 T.C.              
          312, 341 (1989).  Both respondent's and petitioner's expert                 
          witnesses estimated a marketability discount, if one were                   
          appropriate, from 15 to 35 percent.  Based on the testimony of              
          both petitioner's and respondent's experts, as well as the record           
          as a whole, we conclude that the minority interest given by                 
          decedent to his family in 1980 and 1981 should carry a discount             
          of 25 percent for marketability and minority interest combined.             
               Finally, the parties discussed whether for 1980 and 1981               
          decedent's gifts should be limited to one exclusion of $3,000               
          each year as a gift to his son.  As we said in discussing the               
          1982 gifts, it is clear on this record that the gifts of stock to           
          Charlesa Cidulka were, in fact, gifts to her husband John Cidulka           
          and, therefore, would not be entitled to a separate exclusion.              
          The situation with respect to the stock given to John Cidulka's             




Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011