City of Columbus, Ohio - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         


                    Investment-type property includes any property,                   
               other than property described in section 148(b)(2)(A),                 
               (B), (C), * * * that is held principally as a passive                  
               vehicle for the production of income.  Except as                       
               otherwise provided, a prepayment for property or                       
               services is investment-type property if a principal                    
               purpose for prepaying is to receive an investment                      
               return from the time the prepayment is made until the                  
               time payment otherwise would be made.  A prepayment is                 
               not investment-type property if--                                      
                         (1)  The prepayment is made for a substantial                
                    business purpose other than investment return and                 
                    the issuer has no commercially reasonable                         
                    alternative to the prepayment, or                                 
                         (2)  Prepayments on substantially the same                   
                    terms are made by a substantial percentage of                     
                    persons who are similarly situated to the issuer                  
                    but who are not beneficiaries of tax-exempt                       
                    financing.                                                        
               The parties have presented us with a welter of arguments               
          many of which are devoted to a semantical analysis of the                   
          foregoing statutory provision and of other provisions of the                
          regulations under sections 148 and 150 dealing with the extent to           
          which the regulations in respect of the refunding of prior issues           
          apply to the proposed bond issue and the BAN's.  In particular,             
          petitioner argues that the proposed bonds constitute a refunding            
          issue of the BAN's and through them of the City Obligation and              
          that the specific tracing methods of the regulations4 preempt any           
          prepayment analysis.  Respondent agrees that the proposed bonds             
          are a refunding issue of the BAN's, so that we may treat the                


          See secs. 1.148-9, 1.150-1(d)(1), (5), Income Tax Regs.                     




Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011