City of Columbus, Ohio - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         


               rules) necessary or appropriate to accomplish the                      
               purpose of the arbitrage restrictions, which is to                     
               eliminate significant arbitrage incentives to issue                    
               more bonds, to issue bonds earlier, or to leave bonds                  
               outstanding longer.  [H. Rept. 100-795 at 327-328                      
               (1988).]                                                               
               In accordance with the authority, section 1.148-10(e),                 
          Income Tax Regs., provides:                                                 
                    (e)  Authority of the Commissioner to clearly                     
               reflect the economic substance of a transaction.  If an                
               issuer enters into a transaction for a principal                       
               purpose of obtaining a material financial advantage                    
               based on the difference between tax-exempt and taxable                 
               interest rates in a manner that is inconsistent with                   
               the purposes of section 148, the Commissioner may                      
               exercise her discretion to depart from the rules of                    
               � 1.148-1 through � 1.148-11 as necessary to clearly                   
               reflect the economic substance of the transaction.  For                
               this purpose, the Commissioner may recompute yield on                  
               an issue or on investments, reallocate payments and                    
               receipts on investments, recompute the rebate amount on                
               an issue, or otherwise adjust any item whatsoever                      
               bearing upon the investments and expenditures of gross                 
               proceeds of an issue.                                                  
               Petitioner makes much of the fact that it is prepared to               
          issue the proposed bonds on the basis of the interest thereon               
          being taxable, i.e., not exempt under section 103(a).  Such being           
          the case, petitioner argues that the prepayment did not have "a             
          principal purpose * * * to receive an investment return" within             
          the meaning of section 1.148-1(b) or 1.148-10(e), Income Tax                
          Regs.  Consequently, petitioner asserts that the question of                
          "yield" becomes irrelevant in determining whether the proposed              
          bonds are arbitrage bonds.  We disagree.                                    






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011