Estate of Joseph R. Cloutier, Joseph A. Cloutier, Fiduciary - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Jon F. Spadorcia, S. Douglas Trolson, and Robert J. Milford,           
          for petitioner.                                                             
               Russell D. Pinkerton, for respondent.                                  


                                 MEMORANDUM OPINION                                   

               LARO, Judge:  The Estate of Joseph R. Cloutier, Joseph A.              
          Cloutier, Fiduciary, petitioned the Court to redetermine                    
          respondent's determination of a $1,212,230 deficiency in the                
          Federal estate tax of the Estate.  Following concessions, we must           
          decide whether a discount for lack of marketability applies to              
          the stipulated value of stock owned by the Decedent at the time             
          of his death, and, if so, the amount of this discount.1  We hold            
          that no discount applies.  Unless otherwise indicated, section              
          references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect as of the             
          date of the Decedent's death.  Rule references are to the Tax               
          Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.  We refer to Joseph R.               
          Cloutier as the Decedent.  We refer to the Decedent’s estate as             


          1 At trial, the Fiduciary made an oral motion that the Court                
          seal the record as to financial information concerning the                  
          Estate.  We did not rule on the Fidiciary’s motion at that time,            
          taking the matter under advisement pending release of our                   
          Memorandum Opinion herein. The oral motion to seal the record               
          will be denied.  Official records of this Court are open to the             
          public for inspection, Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448           
          U.S. 555, 567-568 (1980), unless a moving party shows that                  
          sufficient countervailing interests outweigh the public interest            
          in access, Willie Nelson Music Co. v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 914,            
          917-920 (1985).  Petitioner has failed to make such a showing.              
          See Estate of Murphy v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-346.                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011